Cooperative Research Centres

Student profile

Kym Kilroy
Masters
University of enrolment: University of Queensland


  KymKilroy

Kym Kilroy is an Aboriginal woman of the Badtjala Clan from the Fraser Island area of Queensland. As a young child Kym was a State Ward and grew up in St Vincent’s Orphanage at Nudgee. Kym has worked in Aboriginal community service areas for many years and recently was employed as the Indigenous Cadetship Coordinator for Department of Employment and Workplace Relations at the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies Unit at the University of Queensland.

In 2003 Kym graduated from the Centre for Indigenous Health at the University of Queensland with a Bachelor of Applied Health Science Degree, majoring in Indigenous Primary Healthcare. As part of her studies Kym completed a research project that described the compliance rates for Indigenous Australian children accessing service providers for immunisation. This study identified that Indigenous mothers' fears of having their children removed by government agencies was a significant factor in their refusal to access immunisation service providers in the Brisbane area.

This project was very successful and produced information that was valuable for Indigenous health service providers in the Brisbane area. Kym is committed to working in the Indigenous health area and believes that there is a great need for research that identifies and addresses the deep personal and social impact that the removal of Indigenous children has had on their families and communities.


Abstract
The Bringing Them Home Report found that most families had been affected, in one or more generations, by government policies and laws requiring the separation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children from their families.

Families and sometimes whole communities would be relocated to isolated reserves and would not be allowed to leave without permission.  Children would be taught basic literacy, gardening and farming, and would become part of a domestic and manual labour force, before returning to the mission or reserve to marry. 

The bonds of family were broken early.  On the government run reserves and church run missions, children were removed from their parents’ care at a young age and placed in segregated dormitory accommodation.  Brothers and sisters were not only separated from their parents, but also from each other.  The care of Aboriginal children in these institutional environments did not measure up to the standards of care in government run orphanages.  

Since 1970 removals have continued at an alarming rate.  This is now referred to as “out-of-home-care”.  In Australia, child protection is the responsibility of the community services departments in the eight states and territories. Because of this, there are eight separate jurisdictions, each with their own distinct legislations, policies and practices in relation to child protection services. While the mission of the departments are similar, namely keeping children safe and assisting families to function during difficult times, the way they go about it can be quite different. These differences impact on the data and make comparisons across the jurisdictions, and across time, problematic.

As at 30 June 2006, 27.0 per 1,000 Indigenous children were subject to protective orders, in comparison with 5.2 per 1,000 non-Indigenous children.

The rates of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children entering the child protection system are higher than the rates for other children. In Queensland Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children and young people (aged 0 -17 Years) make up 6.3 per cent of Queensland's children and young people yet they account for 26 per cent of all children and young people in the care of Queensland's Department of Child Safety.

Of particular note are the significant and growing numbers of Indigenous children who are subject to guardianship and custody orders. The key question this raises is how many of these children have been removed and placed in “out-of-home” care.

Research Aims and Questions

Questions:

  • Why are our Indigenous children still being removed?
  • What effect has this had on Indigenous Families in Brisbane?

 

Aims:
THIS STUDY WILL research the social determinants of Indigenous health and the mental health factors in personal and community wellbeing in relation to the Removal of Indigenous Children from the family unit.  The primary focus areas for research will be:

Objectives:

  • Post – Traumatic Stress: identification of the broader impact of child removal events and the factors that inform the fear of removal in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander families living in urban Brisbane.  The effect of this trauma and fear on individual and family well being.
 
  • To gain an understanding of Cross Generational Trauma: the ways in which child removal events resonate across generations and descriptions of the influence these events have on the behaviour, attitudes and well being of families over time.
 
  • Narratives of Denial: how policy and practice ignore, and how individuals, families and communities cope/protect.

Methodology
In conducting my research I will utilize “Mixed Methods” using quantitative, qualitative, narrative, and ethnographic research methods. 

My targeted population from the wider Brisbane Area this will include any Indigenous Carers (with Indigenous Children in their care past and present). Service Providers (current and passed) who want to tell their stories about the removal of Indigenous children from within the family unit.  My focus group are the Stolen Generations Healing Group and any stolen generation persons who want to share their life history story. 

I will also talk with Indigenous and non-Indigenous -key informants from Department of Child Safety, Department of Families and Communities let them tell their stories on Indigenous removals, placements, reunification, intervention programs, what works, or what’s wrong with it.

 

Back to student profiles

 

 



All Content © CRC for Aboriginal Health 2006